Epson F170 vs. Sawgrass SG500 Sublimation Printers

The Epson F170 and the Sawgrass SG500 are both popular dye-sublimation printers, but they have some distinct differences in terms of features, intended use, and target audience. Here’s a comparison to help you understand the key differences:

1. Brand and Ecosystem

  • Epson F170:
    • Part of Epson’s line of dye-sublimation printers.
    • Epson manufactures both the printer and the sublimation ink, so it is designed to work seamlessly with their proprietary ink (Epson Sublimation Ink).
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Manufactured by Sawgrass, which specializes in dye-sublimation printing.
    • It’s specifically designed for sublimation and comes with Sawgrass Sublimation Ink, which is highly regarded for color quality and consistency.

2. Size and Print Capacity

  • Epson F170:
    • Compact and designed for small-format printing.
    • Maximum print size is 8.5″ x 14″, making it suitable for smaller products like mugs, phone cases, and small fabric prints.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Also compact but has the option to upgrade with a bypass tray, allowing for larger print sizes up to 13″ x 19″ with the tray.
    • Great for a wider variety of substrates, including larger items like apparel.

3. Ink System

  • Epson F170:
    • Uses a cartridge-based ink system with Epson’s own dye-sublimation ink.
    • Ink comes in 4 colors: CMYK.
    • The cartridges are relatively small, so you may need to replace them frequently if printing in high volumes.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Uses Sawgrass SubliJet-UHD ink, which is known for vibrant colors and durability.
    • Also a 4-color system: CMYK.
    • The SG500’s ink is more expensive per ml compared to Epson, but it is optimized for high-quality sublimation output.

4. Software

  • Epson F170:
    • Offers basic printing software with some templates for sublimation projects.
    • It can work with various design software, but there’s no specialized design software bundled with it.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Comes with Sawgrass Print Manager and CreativeStudio, which is a design platform specifically for sublimation printing. CreativeStudio has built-in templates, color profiles, and tools for sublimation-focused designs.
    • The color management with Sawgrass Print Manager is more refined, helping to achieve more accurate and consistent colors.

5. Price

  • Epson F170:
    • More budget-friendly and typically priced around $350-$400.
    • Ink and replacement parts (like the printhead) tend to be more affordable.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • More expensive, typically priced around $550-$600.
    • Ink cartridges are more costly, but they are designed for professional-quality output.

6. Target Audience

  • Epson F170:
    • Ideal for beginners or hobbyists who want to explore dye-sublimation printing on a smaller scale.
    • Suitable for home-based businesses with limited print volume needs.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Aimed at professional sublimation printers and small businesses looking for higher quality and more versatility.
    • It is well-suited for businesses that require consistent and high-quality output for various sublimation products.

7. Durability and Output Quality

  • Epson F170:
    • Produces good-quality prints, especially for beginners, but may lack the color vibrancy and consistency of the Sawgrass SG500 in some cases.
  • Sawgrass SG500:
    • Known for better color accuracy and vibrancy due to specialized Sawgrass inks and software.
    • The SG500 is considered more reliable for heavy use, making it a solid choice for professional-level projects.

Summary:

  • Epson F170: Budget-friendly, smaller print capacity, good for beginners and hobbyists, affordable inks.
  • Sawgrass SG500: Higher-end printer with better color management, higher-quality output, larger print options, and geared towards small businesses or professional use.

If you’re looking for professional-quality prints and better software support, the Sawgrass SG500 is likely the better choice. If you’re a beginner or have a limited budget, the Epson F170 would be a more cost-effective option.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *